|
Space Forum - A work in Progress
Multiple universes is what makes sense. Many of the
unexplainable phenomena fit this model.
The theory
of just one Big Bang system 13.7 billion years ago is invalid. Here are some
anomalies that have gone unanswered.
1.
There are stars in our universe that appear to be over 13.7 billion years old.
2.
There is a very large influence of matter that is classified as black matter
because it can not be seen.
3.
The Universe involved in the big bang is expanding faster now than before and the
expansion is accelerating.
These
anomalies are explainable if you consider the universe as larger than previously
thought. Our universe as we know it, is visible because the matter is expanding
from a more central point. Much of what we see is not as it is today. Much is
classified as 100 or more million light years away. Therefore we are seeing it
as it was where it was in times past. Much of what we see in locations where we
see it does not exist anymore because it has past its life cycle. A star of the
size we would expect to last 5 billion years that is 10 billion light years away
would not still exist. Gravities influence thought to be smallest of the other
natural forces, is not because its influence is felt between heavenly bodies far
enough apart that the light from both sources would not have arrived at a
central point.
If for
instance the entirety of space is large enough to encompass a multitude of big
bang areas there masses and influences on each other would be monumental. A
galaxy from a dying universe most probably will be consumed by its black hole.
Not having enough mass to create a big bang it would then travel outward. This
“GBH” Galaxy Mass Black Hole would have the mass of a galaxy. If the center of
mass of that universes big bang started out say 50 billion light years away
there could be hundreds of there “GBH” black holes headed our way. If our
universe is situated in a cluster of other universes we could have these “GBH”
black holes headed toward us from many directions. The light from all of these
universes instead of emanating from the central point of our big bang for us to
observe expanding from our central point is coming toward us and therefore the
light has not yet arrived. If something is expanding from the same central point
you came from the columns of light are continuous. Stars on the other hand that
are created in nurseries have new light at there birth so that light has the
period of time of its distance at birth to arrive. Therefore there is a
conglomerate of new Suns that gives us what we see but not the reality of what
is in the universe at that moment.
Some of the
older that 13.5 billion year old stars that appear are stars that were thrown
free of their universes and have arrived solo. Many of these other “GBH” black
holes that are arriving are accelerating the expanding mass from our universe
may in fact be among us. They would not give off light or emanating energy
because they have not yet collected new mass and energy. Being incoming their
mass would not be easily detected because their influences would be in just
deflecting the paths of light behind them. Their coming at us from our edge of
the universe would be hard to detect except from the acceleration of expansion.
From the other side of our 13.7 billion year old universe they could be detected
first through the bending of light as stars pass their column of influence. The
lone black holes with this type of influence inside our galaxy may be moving
toward the center of our big bang. Therefore much of the matter that causes our
next big bang may be matter from another universe. Likewise much of our universe
may not stop until it is part of another universes big bang.
How many
loner black holes are in our midst and which way are they moving. All those
moving in toward the center of our last big bang are probably from another
universe.
Black
matter may be in fact a great number of incoming black holes.
Contact
me Sherman Smith by sending email to scienceforum@hotmail.com |